INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION DIGEST
February 2006
Copyright © 2006 World Expertise LLC – All rights reserved
A periodic electronic newsletter for engineering education
leaders,
edited by Russel
C. Jones, Ph.D., P.E., and Bethany S. Oberst, Ph.D.
CONTENTS
1 -
International developments. 2
Inside the Great Firewall of China. 2
A perspective on Afghan higher ed. 2
Microsoft bares code to avoid EU fines. 3
Irreparable change to climate debated. 3
U. of Tokyo closes lab in case of suspected research
fraud. 4
$1 billion foundation to begin new Indian research
university. 4
European Institute of Technology takes form.. 4
President of International Council for Science denied US
visa. 4
South Korean education ‘Blitzkrieg’ 5
Some surprise winners in German funding competition. 5
France’s basic science agency in turmoil 5
Internet TOEFL raises major concerns. 6
Re-engineering Iraq. 6
US academic canned in Emirates for showing those cartoons. 6
2 -
US developments. 6
US State of the Union. 6
American competitiveness initiative. 7
2007 US budget – big winners and losers. 7
It’s all in how you look at it: new US Engineering
Indicators report 7
Restrictions on foreign researchers loosened. 8
Another initiative to proceed aPACE. 8
US partner in Korean scandal accused of “research
misbehavior”. 8
Panel explores standardized tests for colleges. 9
Role of S&T in international development 9
Harvard president resigns. 9
Engineers Week 2006. 10
3 -
Technology. 10
One-hour brainstorming gave birth to digital imaging. 10
UNDP is new partner in $100 laptop project 10
National LambdaRail complete: how will it be administered?. 10
Last telegram marks the end of an era. 11
4 -
Students, faculty, education. 11
Introducing engineering to children. 11
Female computer science students wanted. 11
Education from the factory floor 12
US students “derailed” from engineering careers. 12
UT Austin reform provokes engineering faculty. 12
New US college students are seasoned volunteers. 13
College ranking systems show distressing trans-global
similarities. 13
US college students still deficient in math. 13
Study claims AP courses don’t contribute to college
achievement 14
5 –
Employment, competitiveness. 14
Entrepreneurial advantage. 14
Outsourcing is climbing skills ladder 14
India set to outsource its outsourcing centers?. 15
Intellectual property wrangling. 15
6 –
Journals. 15
Journal of Engineering Education. 15
European Journal of Engineering Education. 15
International Journal of Engineering Education. 16
IEEE Transactions on Education. 16
Journal of STEM Education. 16
7 –
Meetings. 16
Global Conference on Engineering Education. 16
Sustainable Development in Africa. 17
Contributions. 17
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo and Google are being pilloried for cooperating with Beijing’s army of censors filtering certain topics such as
“democracy” and “human rights” from their China based search engines. Those
defending the actions of such companies note that any company that wants to do
business in China
today has to operate according to Chinese laws. But, according to an article by
Clay Chandler in the March 6th issue of Fortune, information wants to be free, even in China, and the firewall may be
crumbling from within. One truth about the Chinese web is that citizens there
today enjoy greater freedom of thought and access to information from outside China
than at any time in history. Despite government efforts to impose a Great
Firewall, there are an estimated 110-million Internet users in China
today, and 16 million bloggers. (See http://www.fortune.com)
The Chronicle of Higher Education recently published
a set of three articles written by Katherine Zoepf on
higher education in Afghanistan. The first is a summary of conditions in the
universities after the rule of the Taliban then the war and
reconstruction. Demand for enrollment is
very strong after enrollment had dropped to only 4000 students and the exodus
of faculty under the repression of the Taliban.
Today enrollment has increase 900%.
Security on the campus of institutions such as Kabul University
is still a problem, as gangs make trouble, especially for female students. With not enough seats available in public
universities to respond to demand, laws were recently passed to allow private
universities to be set up. Many of the
faculty are not qualified with doctoral degrees, although with money from the
World Bank faculty with doctorates were given a $300 a month bonus, and those
with master’s a $200 a month bonus, this on top of the $60 per month base pay
for academics. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i21/21a04401.htm)
A second article is entitled, "Women Fight for Opportunity
and Respect at Afghan Universities," which reveals that teaching is such a
low status occupation that women are reluctant to enroll in teacher training
programs. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i21/21a04801.htm)
A third article describes the new American
University of Afghanistan which is set to open in Kabul this March. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i21/21a04601.htm)
Microsoft Corporation has offered to allow rivals some
access to the proprietary source code of its Windows operating system, in a
move designed to head off large daily fines in Europe and to mollify
increasingly impatient antitrust authorities in the US. Analysts say the move is a
shrewd step – not only deflecting criticism that the company is defying legal
orders to share programming information, but also to thwart the ambitions of
software developers who advocate free or “open source” access. As described by
Mary Jacoby in Wall Street Journal articles
on January 26th and 28th, however, European regulators
have warned Microsoft that offering access to proprietary source code for
Windows would not solve all its problems. Experts have told the EU regulators that the documentation being provided by
Microsoft does not allow even simple programming tasks to be accomplished. The
European Commission is to hold a hearing on the matter, and daily fines could
go into effect by late March if it concludes that the company is still failing
to comply with its orders. (See http://www.wsj.com)
Now that most scientists agree that human activity is
causing the Earth to warm, the central debate has shifted to whether climate
change is progressing so rapidly that within decades humans may be helpless to
slow or reverse the trend. According to an article in the January 29th
Washington Post by Juliet Eilperin, the “tipping point” scenario has begun to consume
many prominent researchers, because the answer could determine how drastically
countries need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in the coming years.
While uncertain when such a point might occur, scientists say it is urgent that
policymakers cut global carbon dioxide emissions in half over the next 50 years
or risk the triggering of changes that would be irreversible. The debate has
bee intensifying because Earth is warming faster than some researchers had
predicted – with 2005 the warmest year on record. (See http://www.washingtonpost.com)
U. of Tokyo closes lab in case of suspected research
fraud
The University
of Tokyo closed the lab
of a chemistry professor in the Graduate School of Engineering citing
accusations of research fraud. A
university committee sent to investigate says that a dozen of the experiments
cited in Kazunari Taira’s
articles, published in prestigious journals, could not be replicated. Taira’s work had
been heavily supported by the Japanese government, who had spent $12 million on
it in six years. Taira
has denied any responsibility, suggesting that one of his assistants may be
implicated, writes Alan Brender in The Chronicle of Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/02/2006020711n.htm)
Indian industrialist Anil Agarwal
has created a $1 billion endowment to found a world-class university dedicated
to graduate teaching and intensive research.
The institution would aspire to educate tomorrow’s Nobel laureates and
community leaders, according to an article in the Khaleej
Times on February 23. Sites under
consideration for the new university include Andhra Pradesh, Goa
and Rajasthan. Management consulting
firm A. T. Kearney India Ltd. has been engaged to advise Agarwal
and to move the project forward. When
completed, the plan is for the university to enroll 100,000 students. (See http://www.khaleejtimes.com)
The European Union took one more step toward the creation of
a European Institute of Technology by revealing a proposal to be debated in
March by the union memberships’ heads of state. The EUT
is meant to prevent brain-drain by providing a Massachusetts Institute of
Technology look-alike focused on research, innovation and graduate studies in
strategic areas. The Institute is scheduled to open in 2009, although it has
not yet been decided whether it will be a research center or a virtual
organization formed from a network of existing institutions. The proposal has received some support,
although there has been strong opposition from those who believe that it will
siphon off much needed funding from universities already short of money, writes
Aisha Labi in The Chronicle of
Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/02/2006022306n.htm)
Goverdhan Mehta, president of the
International Council for Science, an organization of national scientific
academics around the world, was denied an entry visa into the US by a consular office in Chennai, touching off
strong protests from the US
scientific community, writes Shankar Vedantam in the Washington Post on February 23,
2006. According to Mehta, not only was
he denied his visa, but his research was questioned as a threat to
security. Under new US visa regulations, applicants are
required to travel long distances to apply in person, and then are subjected to
intense scrutiny if their research touches on certain high technology areas.
Mehta, a former visiting professor at the University of Florida,
was invited to return there to give a presentation at an international
conference. The US Embassy in New Delhi, in an unusual move, issued an apology, and the
State Department attempted to resolve the matter before President Bush's trip
to India.
(See http://www.washingtonpost.com)
The president of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and
Technology, Nobel physics laureate Robert Laughlin, has plans to make KAIST an academic powerhouse to compete with the likes of
MIT. Now, according to an article in the January 20th Science by Richard Stone, he has a war
chest from the South Korean legislature to make that happen. The legislature
has approved the first installment of a $97-million “globalization package” for
KAIST. Increased funding will allow the institution
to raise the fraction of foreign faculty to 15%, and aim to teach all graduate
courses in English by 2010, among other changes. The fund will also strengthen
the institution’s R&D, allowing awards of seed money for innovative
projects and the luring of talent with handsome start-up packages. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
In an effort to strengthen its public universities, the
German government is conducting a multi-tiered competition for funding. The first round of competition is now over,
and 90 out of 319 applications have been certified as qualifying for the next
round. Universities had to compete in
three categories. The first involved the design of new graduate programs or
schools. Twenty-one institutions had
their proposals approved, and will now submit proposals for ultimate funding.
The second competition involves designing partnerships for research with a
university at the center. Of the 39
finalists selected, about 15 will be funded at a level of $7.8 million
annually. The third category of
competition will be open only to institutions which have won at least one award
in each of the two other competitions.
Five universities will be selected from the 10 already qualifying, and
each will be given $25.2 million annually. The competition will be held again
next year. A process of this sort is a
distinct departure from past funding plans in Germany, but supporters think it is
a way for German universities to regain some of their lost stature. When the results of the first round were
announced, there were some major surprises.
While the well-known Humboldt University failed to qualify for the third
competition, the Free University of Berlin did, along with the University of
Bremen, which does not the have prominence of some other universities. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/01/2006012405n.htm)
France’s basic science agency in turmoil
The leading basic research agency in France, CNRS, is struggling to get back on course after the loss of
two top managers. According to an article by Barbara Casassus
in the January 20th Science, the
departure of the top two officers resulted from a standoff between them over
the selection of department directors. The president resigned in early January,
and the number two officer was fired by the government a few days later. At the
heart of the issues is the government’s science reform bill that is currently
being implemented. Moving quickly, the government installed a new president
a physicist who had been a CNRS director from 1997-2000. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
Internet TOEFL raises major concerns
A major storm has brewed up in Europe
around the decision by the US Educational Testing Service to administer the
well-known Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL)
via the Internet at specific testing centers.
When the new system was introduced last fall, there were many reports of
students unable to take the test in a timely fashion because of lack of centers
and sufficient seats, reports Aisha Labi in The
Chronicle of Higher Education. In
some notorious cases, students traveled to other countries in order to take the
test where seats were available. This
test is essential to the application process for foreign students aspiring to
study in the United States.
ETS says it has been responsive to criticisms by
increasing its capacity, but criticisms continue, and the news that the ETS is also planning to shift the administration of the
Graduate Record Exam to an Internet base has sent fright waves through the
academic communities on both sides of the Atlantic. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/01/2006012503n.htm)
US and Iraqi officials have spent billions on restoring Iraq’s electrical system – so why is Baghdad getting just 6
hours of electricity a day? An analysis by Glenn Zorpette
in the February 2006 IEEE Spectrum states
that never before has so vast a reconstruction program been attempted in the
face of enemy fire or managed in the shadow of geopolitics. Engineers involved
in the reconstruction estimate that between $20- and 40-billion is needed to
provide electricity throughout the country, and that level of money is not
available. (See http://www.spectrum.ieee.org)
US academic canned in Emirates for showing
those cartoons
A US English professor at Zayed University
in the United Arab Emirates
was fired for showing her students the cartoons which have set off riots and
protests in Muslim countries around the world.
This was within the context of a discussion about freedom of expression,
reports Katherine Zoepf in The Chronicle of Higher Education.
One student complained to the university administration, then parents became angry as well, resulting in the firing
by the chancellor. Zayed University is reportedly considering
running sensitivity training for its expatriate faculty. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/02/2006021504n.htm)
2 - US developments
In the traditional annual address by the President of the US,
George W. Bush focused heavily on American competitiveness in the global
economy. As reported by various writers in major coverage in the February 1st
Washington Post, President Bush
outlined a litany of domestic initiatives to make the US more competitive overseas. He
declared that “America is addicted to oil”, and vowed to push for alternative
energy sources allowing the US to replace three-quarters of the petroleum now
imported from the Middle East, by 2025. He also vowed to steer more funding
into scientific research and education. The President proposed a ten year
$136-billion initiative that would double the federal commitment to basic
scientific research, and train tens of thousands of new math and science
teachers. (See http://www.washingtonpost.com)
In his State of the Union Address, President Bush announced
the American Competitiveness Initiative to
encourage American innovation and strengthen the US ability to compete in the global
economy. As described in a White House release, the initiative will increase
federal investment in critical research, ensure that the US continues to lead the world in
opportunity and innovation, and provide American children with strong
foundations in math and science. Elements of the initiative include doubling
the federal commitment to basic research in the physical sciences over the next
10 years, encouraging a favorable environment for additional private sector
investment in innovation, improving math and science education for American
children, supporting universities to provide world-class education and research
opportunities, providing job training to improve the skills of American
workers, attracting and retaining the best and brightest immigrants, and
fostering a business environment that encourages entrepreneurship. (See http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/01/20060131-5.html)
A promised 10-year doubling for NSF, NIST
and energy research would be offset by no growth for NIH
and NASA in President Bush’s spending request for 2007, according to an article
by Eli Kintisch and Jeffrey Mervis
in the February 10th Science. The
proposed budget answers fervent wishes by the scientific community for a boost
to the physical sciences, more attention to science and math education in the
public schools, and a focus on applied energy research. But in trying to
balance the costs of two wars and additional tax cuts, and a desire to trim
spending, the President’s budget would flat-line NIH
and NASA budgets for the next 5 years. Presidential Science Advisor John Marburger notes that the proposed 14% rise for the
Department of Energy’s Office of Science, and the 7.9% boost for NSF represent
high priority areas that are most likely to generate the sort of results that
will create technologies to improve US competitiveness. The boost for NSF would
provide an estimated 500 new research grants across all disciplines and a $5000
increase in the annual grant size, to $148,000. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
The US National Science Board released its biennial report,
“Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006,” (available at http://www.nsf.gov) on February 23, reports
David Epstein in Inside Higher Ed.
While the figures related to student achievement in math and science
have in some cases improved, in others they have only held steady or were a bit
lower, leading the authors to express concern about the long-term strength of
US leadership in engineering and science. Nearly 25% of science teachers and
20% of math teachers are not fully certified in the subject matter they are
teaching. Overall, US students remain in
the middle of the pack in achievement among industrialized nations. The report emphasizes the importance of
primary and secondary education in science and math, and makes recommendations
for strengthening teacher competency in these subjects by recruiting people
with graduate degrees into the schools as an alternative to a strictly research
oriented university career. (See http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/02/24/scienceed)
The US Commerce Department has abandoned a plan that would
have restricted foreign students’ and other scholars’ access to sensitive
technology based on their countries of birth, according to an article in the
January 17th Chronicle of
Higher Education by Kelly Field. The plan could have required American
colleges and universities to obtain export-control licenses for thousands more
of their foreign students and researchers.
After hearing from dozens of researchers in industry and academe, the Commerce
Department concluded that there was little evidence that its plan would improve
national security. Another provision of the plan, still being proposed, would
require colleges to obtain licenses for foreigners to work with equipment that
is subject to export controls, even if the underlying research is exempt from
licensing. (See http://chronicle.com)
Four US Senators have introduced legislation for the PACE
Act, (Protecting America’s Competitive Edge), designed to support improved math
and science studies in the US. Faced with reports on the deficiencies of
students in these areas, the act would include enhancing teacher preparation
for primary and secondary schools, along with stipends for undergraduate and
graduate students in math, science and engineering. This report was written by
David Epstein in Inside Higher Ed. (See http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/01/26/pace)
The University of Pittsburgh (USA)
released the report on its investigation of faculty member Gerald P. Schatten’s involvement in the fraudulent stem cell research
of Woo Suk Hwang of South Korea. Schatten was the
lead author of a paper with Hwang that was published in Science. The investigatory
panel said that while Schatten did not commit
research misconduct, he did commit “research misbehavior,” a term used in the
university’s faculty handbook to cover sloppy practices. It pointed out that Schatten
benefited from his role as co-author, and stood to gain even more had Hwang
been award the Nobel Prize for which a group which included Schatten
nominated him. Disciplinary actions have not been announced, according to Lila Guterman reporting in The
Chronicle of Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/02/2006021302n.htm)
A higher education commission named by the Bush
administration is examining whether standardized testing should be expanded
into universities and colleges to prove that students are learning, and to
allow easier comparisons on quality. According to an article by Karen Arenson in the February 9th New York Times, the Commission on the Future of Higher Education
has until August to report on issues that include accountability, cost and
quality. Educators are wary, stating that to subject
colleges to uniform standards is to trivialize higher education. But the
Commission chair argues that public reporting of collegiate learning as
measured through testing would be greatly beneficial to students, parents,
taxpayers and employers by creating a national database that includes measures
of learning. (See http://www.nytimes.com)
Role of S&T in international development
The US National Research Council has released a new report,
“The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development:
An Imperative for the US Agency for International Development”. It notes that science and technology
capabilities are fundamental for social and economic progress in developing
countries, and that international programs based on S&T
are critical components of US
foreign policy. Maintaining and strengthening the contributions of the science,
engineering and medical capabilities of the US to foreign assistance programs
administered by the US Agency for International Development are the themes of
the report. Among other key recommendations, the report states that USAID should reverse the decline in its support for
building S&T capacity in developing countries.
(See http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11583.html)
Lawrence Summers has resigned as president of Harvard University, after a relatively brief and
turbulent tenure of five years. As reported in the February 22nd New York Times by Alan Finder et al, his
resignation was apparently nudged by Harvard’s governing corporation and by an
impending vote of no confidence from the influential Faculty of Arts and
Sciences. The announcement by Dr. Summers, an economist and former Secretary of
the Treasury, disappointed many students on campus and raised questions about
future leaders’ ability to govern Harvard with its vocal and independent-minded
faculty. Summers’s well-known desire to change Harvard’s culture, which he saw
as complacent, was accompanied by slights of some faculty members and missteps
like his statement last year that women might lack an intrinsic aptitude for
math and science. And some of his major decisions – including overhauling the
undergraduate curriculum, appointing deans and mapping out a new campus – were
hugely divisive at the 370-year-old university. Summers has been offered a
sabbatical year and return to a university professorship, but friends say that
he will be exploring other opportunities as well. (See http://www.nytimes.com)
The annual US
celebration of Engineers Week, held during the week that surrounds George
Washington’s birthday, focused this year on spreading its message to those who
can best reach young people – educators. One new program, Connecting Educators
to Engineering, is the legacy project of the 2006 co-chairs, Northrop Grumman
Corporation and the Society of Women Engineers. Engineers Week 2006 also
introduced a DVD geared toward middle school students, called Ask an Engineer. It is a fast-paced
introduction to the wonders of modern engineering and what engineers do. In
addition, a major new book on women’s contributions to engineering – “Changing
Our World: True Stories of Women Engineers” (ASCE
Press) – was unveiled during a National Press Club event. (See http://www.eweek.org).
In a one-hour brainstorming session in late 1969, two Bell Labs
researchers drew up the basic design for a memory chip they called the
“charge-coupled-device”. As described in an article by Guy Gugliotta
in the February 20th Washington
Post, the device initially worked well for data storage – but its future
clearly lay in its breathtaking potential for capturing and storing images.
During Engineers Week ceremonies, the two researchers – Willard Boyle and
George Smith – were recognized for their pioneering development with the award
of the $500,000 Charles Stark Draper Prize of the National Academy of
Engineering. The CCD allows images to be captured
electronically, rather than on photographic film. It has revolutionized fields
such as space exploration and earth based photography. (See http://www.washingtonpost.com)
UNDP is
new partner in $100 laptop project
The United Nations and the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (USA)
have joined in a project to design $100 laptop computers for children around
the world. The agreement reached between
the two institutions will expand the scope of the previously announced project,
which was aimed at seven large developing countries. The UN Development Programme
reaches smaller and poorer developing countries that might not have the ability
to participate. Jeffrey R. Young covered
this story for The Chronicle of Higher
Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/01/2006013001t.htm)
National LambdaRail complete: how will it be administered?
The new fiber-optic computer network known as National LambdaRail has been completed, writes Vincent Kiernan in The Chronicle of Higher Education. Now the
challenge is to determine how it will be operated. For over a year there have been discussions
about linking National LambdaRail with Internet2,
another academic research network, but decisions have been delayed. National LambdaRail
is run by a group of 30 large universities, while Internet2 has over 200
members, some of them quite small institutions.
(See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/02/2006022201t.htm)
Western Union has delivered its last telegram, 150 years
after the company was started and revolutionized communications by zapping
messages across the US
in less than an hour. According to an article by Valerie Bauerlein
in the February 3rd Wall
Street Journal, the telegram business had withered to 20,000 last year, as
other technologies displaced its effectiveness. The last telegram was sent on
January 27th. Western Union has
shifted its focus to wiring money. (See http://www.wsj.com)
The former dean of engineering at Tufts
University who convinced the Massachusetts
legislature to introduce engineering into the K-12 science and technology
curriculum, Ioannis Miaoulis,
is now pursuing his passion of introducing engineering to children as head of
the Boston Museum of Science. As described by Alice Daniel in the January 2006 ASEE Prism, Miaoulis
believes that engineering can be done at different educational levels, without
a full knowledge of math and science. At the Museum of Science,
for example, a new program called Design Challenges lets children solve basic
engineering problems, such as building a proper habitat for a ferret with a
variety of materials. Intent on spreading his approaches, Miaoulis
has developed a National Center for Technological Literacy, headquartered at
the Museum of Science, to develop and teach curricula,
provide workshops for teachers, partner with universities and museums
nationwide, and establish hubs in different states to work with teachers and
legislators on introducing engineering into public education. (See http://www.asee.org/prism)
Colleges are working to attract and support women in technology
majors such as computer science, according to an article in the January 13th
Chronicle of Higher Education by
Scott Carlson. A report from the National
Center for Education
Statistics shows that the proportion of women in computer and information sciences
has dwindled in the last 20 years, especially compared with other fields in
mathematics and sciences. The head of the Center for Women and Information
Technology at the University of Maryland at Baltimore County,
Claudia Morrell, says “Computer fields have a geeky image, and girls in
particular don’t want to be perceived as geeks and nerds”. Several universities
are developing programs to counter the childhood influences that steer girls
away from the computer science field, and to build support programs for female
students in the field. (See http://chronicle.com)
President William Wulf of the
National Academy of Engineering says that for too long, engineering education
has been in second place to actual engineering contributions. As reported in an
article by Eva Kaplan Leiserson in the March PE Magazine, that observation explains
the reason behind the Academy’s strategy to recognize major contributions to
engineering education – including the $500,000 Bernard M. Gordon Prize for
Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. During this year’s
Engineers Week, the 2006 Gordon Prize was awarded to a cross-institutional team
that created the Learning Factory, a program in which multidisciplinary student
teams face the challenges of real-world problems from industry. The Learning
Factory is a hands-on laboratory where students can put engineering theory into
practice by carrying their ideas through conception, design, and manufacturing.
According to one of its developers, what the Learning Factory does well is to
bridge the gap between the way professors want to teach and the way engineering
really happens in the real world. (See http://www.nspe.org)
US students “derailed” from engineering
careers
France A. Córdova, an
astrophysicist who serves as chancellor of the University
of California at Riverside, gave a major address at the
American Council on Education’s annual meeting, saying figures indicate that
American students have interest in engineering, technology, science and math,
but that they are “derailed” somewhere along the way, including in college
itself. She said that one in three first
year college students is interested in these areas of study, but in the end,
only 5% graduate with degrees in those fields, reports Jeffrey Selingo in The
Chronicle of Higher Education. Even
special programs designed to attract and maintain student interest are
frequently available only after a student has navigated through several gate
keeping courses. Among Córdova's recommendations is to admit all students
into a core curriculum, offering them opportunities to consider subject areas
before they declare their major. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/02/2006021404n.htm)
UT Austin reform provokes engineering faculty
The University of Texas at Austin (USA) is now debating the merits of a
proposal to standardize the first year undergraduate curriculum, which includes
the establishment of University
College into which all
freshmen would be admitted before proceeding into specific colleges. The College of Engineering
is strongly opposed, insisting that engineering students are recruited directly
by its faculty and thus should be able to join the college immediately upon
admission. To do otherwise would delay
graduation and weaken the link between the students and their major faculty,
writes David Epstein in Inside Higher Ed. Supporters of the proposal like the required
“signature course,” large sections of interdisciplinary study taught by
full-time faculty and then divided into small discussion sections. (See http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/02/23/texas)
New US college students are seasoned volunteers
The University of California’s Higher Education Research
Institute released its annual national survey of incoming first year students
in US college and universities, reports Eric Hoover in The Chronicle of
Higher Education. One exciting finding was that two thirds of the students
said they wanted to help others who are in difficulty. A record number of the students (83%) also
said that they had done some volunteer work during their last year in high
school. And over a
quarter of the students said that they would probably volunteer while in
college. While almost equal
percentages of men and women students said they went to college to get a better
job, more women than men saw getting a good overall education and learning to
appreciate ideas as an important reason for enrolling. More students are more interested in politics
these days, fewer want to increase military spending, and although beer
consumption in high school dropped, that was not reflected in their campus
drinking habits. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/01/2006012603n.htm)
Doug Lederman of Inside
Higher Ed addresses the issue of college rankings by taking an
international perspective. He found that
the characteristics that irritated US college administrators were found as well
in similar rankings in other countries.
Most ranking systems are compiled by for-profit publishing companies,
and attempt to provide consumers with a single, easily understood, number which
indicates quality. But it is the ones
who design the ranking systems who select the indicators of quality and thus
define quality itself. One German system
avoids this distortion. The Center for
Higher Education Development produces a ranking of academic departments,
placing them into the top, middle or bottom of the separate indicators, then
leaves it to the reader to determine which of the indicators is of interest,
thus freeing the consumer to define quality.
(See http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/02/21/rankings)
US college students still deficient in math
The Washington based
American Institutes for Research recently published a study indicating that not
even half of US
college students graduate with proficiency in math, reports Sara Lipka in The Chronicle of
Higher Education. Students were
queried on three skills: quantitative literacy, prose literacy and document
literacy, the latter designed to determine whether students could fill out a
form or read a label. Fewer than half of
the students graduating from four year institutions were rated as proficient in
all three categories, and one fifth of those students were at or below basic
quantitative literacy. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/01/200601004n.htm)
While record numbers of US high school students are taking
Advanced Placement courses and receiving college credit for their high scores,
a study just released by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science suggests a dark side to this seeming achievement. In a study of 18,000 students who took
introductory courses in biology, chemistry and physics in college, the achievement of students who had
previously taken AP courses in those subjects, and did well, was only a little
better than that of students who had not taken AP. The bottom line for the researchers who
conducted this study, Philip M. Sadler of Harvard and Robert H. Tai of the University of Virginia, is that AP courses do not make
a significant contribution to student academic success in college. The College Board, owner of the AP exams, is
disputing their findings, writes Scott Jaschik in Inside
Higher Ed. (See http://insidehighered/com/news/2006/02/20/ap)
Responding to signs that the US is losing its monopoly on high
technology, policymakers are calling for new measures to increase the number of
science and technology graduates and increase R&D investment. A new report,
sponsored in part by the Kauffman Foundation, argues that policymakers are
failing to recognize distinctive aspects of the emerging global economy.
Researchers from Case
Western Reserve University
and the Urban Institute studied engineering in multinational corporation home
countries and in emerging economies. Their findings suggest that the US cannot expect to match the numbers of
engineers being trained in India
and China, so the US
should seek “collaborative advantage” by developing a new role in the global
technology system by training “global engineers”, supporting research where
there is true comparative advantage, and developing mutual-gain partnerships.
(See http://www.kauffman.org/entrepreneurship.cfm?topic=economic_development&itemID=663)
The globalization of work tends to start from the bottom up.
According to an article by Steve Lohr in the February
16th New York Times, the
first jobs moved abroad are assembly tasks and manufacturing, and later skilled
work like computer programming. At the end of this progression is the work done
by scientists and engineers in research and development laboratories. A new
study funded by the Kauffman Foundation suggests that more and more research
work at corporations will be sent to fast-growing economies with strong
education systems, such as China
and India.
In a survey of more than 200 multinational corporations on their research
center decisions, 38% said they planned to “change substantially” the worldwide
distribution of their R&D work over the next three years, with the booming
markets of China and India, with their world-class researchers, attracting the
greatest increase in projects. The report found that while lower costs and tax
incentives play a role in such decisions, the primary driving force is the
availability of talent. And a company that is going to be a global leader has
to understand what is going on in the rest of the world. (See http://www.nytimes.com)
India set to outsource its outsourcing centers?
India’s BPOs are poised to move into Argentina
and Eastern Europe, says an article posted on
newindpress.com on February 21. These
companies are responding to the fact that language skills, with the exception
of English, are not strength of the Indian population. So these companies are looking at overseas
locations where labor is relatively cheap and people can speak Spanish and
other languages currently in demand by their customers. An additional development in offshore
outsourcing comes in a report from Nasscom-McKinsey, which says that only about
25% of technical graduates of India’s
institutions have sufficient skills to be employed in IT companies. (See http://www.newindpress.com)
Time-consuming wrangling over intellectual property issues
is affecting the relationship between academia and industry, according to an
article by Thomas Grose in the February ASEE
Prism. Companies complain that too many university technology transfer
administrators have an unrealistic view that they can make money off of all
research. And research contract negotiations often get hung up between the
parties such that a company may spend more on attorney’s fees than the value of
the contract being negotiated. Corporate America has found one solution to
this problem
taking its research proposals to
foreign schools. One industry observer says “American universities will either
have to modify their behavior or lose their industrial customers”. (See http://www.asee.org/prism)
The January 2006 issue of this ASEE journal includes seven
papers on various aspects of research in engineering education. In a guest
editorial, Norman Fortenberry of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship
on Engineering Education at the National Academy of Engineering outlines an
extensive agenda for engineering education research. The lead article presents
the 2005 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture, written by the three Purdue University
faculty members recognized for their development of the Engineering Projects in
Community Service (EPICS) program. (See http://www.asee.org)
The December 2005 issue of this journal of the European
Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) contains ten papers on two themes:
Improving Engineering Education in Europe, and
Gender Studies in Engineering Education. The six papers on the first theme are
introduced by Claudio Borri, current President of SEFI, noting that the papers
relate to the results and impact of the ERASMUS Thematic Network project
“E4-Enhancing Engineering Education in Europe”.
The second theme of the issue is introduced by Susanne Ihsen, citing the
development of gender studies in engineering education over the past 100 years.
The lead paper in this section reports on a SEFI workshop about creating a
women friendly culture in institutes of higher engineering education. (See http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals)
The first 2006 issue of this journal includes a major
section on a special topic: Agricultural/Biosystems/Biological Engineering
Education, edited by Linus Opara and Joel Cuello. The nine papers in this
section discuss biological engineering as a field of study and how it fits into
the engineering education spectrum. The remaining five papers in the issue
cover agricultural engineering education in developing and transitional
countries. (See http://www.ijee.dit.ie)
The 22 papers in the February 2006 issue of this journal
cover a wide variety of topics in electrical engineering education, including
problem-based learning, first programming course, computer-aided teaching,
wireless communications, engineering practice in a freshman course, information
security, web-based instruction, and a K-12 nanotechnology program for
teachers. (See http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/es)
Two issues of this electronic journal from late 2005 have
been posted on the web. Articles cover problem-based computer engineering
education, a pre-engineering program for disadvantaged youth, and software
design education. (See http://www.auburn.edu/research/litee/jstem/viewissue.php)
The fifth in a series of annual conferences sponsored by the
UNESCO International Centre for Engineering Education will be held at Polytechnic University,
Brooklyn, New
York from 17-21 July 2006. The congress will debate
important global issues in engineering and technology education. It will
concentrate on three themes: general issues in engineering and technology
education, international collaboration in engineering and technology education,
and academia/industry collaboration in engineering and technology education.
Abstracts are currently being sought. (See http://www.eng.monash.edu.au/uicee)
An International Conference on Sustainable Engineering
Development in Africa will be held in Yaounde,
Cameroon, on
4-8 June 2006. The conference will explore how the engineering profession can
implement sustainable engineering projects to meet the UN Millennium
Development Goals through capacity building in rural communities in Africa. Proposals for papers to be presented are now
being sought. (See http://www.ewb-international.org/ASAP06.htm)
To contribute information to this electronic newsletter,
please send it by e-mail to russel-c-jones@worldexpertise.com
This Digest
provides summaries of published articles, both printed and electronic. World
Expertise does not endorse or corroborate the information in these articles.
Some publication web sites may require user registration before access is
granted to articles via the links provided above.
Back issues of this International
Engineering Education Digest can be read on the Web at http://www.worldexpertise.com